Custom regression models¶

Like for univariate models, it is possible to create your own custom parametric survival models. Why might you want to do this?

Create new / extend AFT models using known probability distributions
Create a piecewise model using domain knowledge about subjects
Iterate and fit a more accurate parametric model

lifelines has a very simple API to create custom parametric regression models. You only need to define the cumulative hazard function. For example, the cumulative hazard for the constant-hazard regression model looks like:

$$ H(t, x) = \frac{t}{\lambda(x)}\\ \lambda(x) = \exp{(\vec{\beta} \cdot \vec{x}^{\,T})} $$

where $\beta$ are the unknowns we will optimize over.

Below are some example custom models.

In [1]:

%matplotlib inline
%config InlineBackend.figure_format = 'retina'

from lifelines.fitters import ParametricRegressionFitter
from autograd import numpy as np
from lifelines.datasets import load_rossi


class ExponentialAFTFitter(ParametricRegressionFitter):
    
    # this class property is necessary, and should always be a non-empty list of strings. 
    _fitted_parameter_names = ['lambda_']
    
    def _cumulative_hazard(self, params, t, Xs):
        # params is a dictionary that maps unknown parameters to a numpy vector. 
        # Xs is a dictionary that maps unknown parameters to a numpy 2d array 
        beta = params['lambda_']
        X = Xs['lambda_']
        lambda_ = np.exp(np.dot(X, beta))
        return t / lambda_
    

rossi = load_rossi()

# the below variables maps {dataframe columns, formulas} to parameters
regressors = {
    # could also be: 'lambda_': rossi.columns.difference(['week', 'arrest'])
    'lambda_': "age + fin + mar + paro + prio + race + wexp + 1"
}

eaf = ExponentialAFTFitter().fit(rossi, 'week', 'arrest', regressors=regressors)
eaf.print_summary()

model	lifelines.ExponentialAFTFitter
duration col	'week'
event col	'arrest'
number of observations	432
number of events observed	114
log-likelihood	-686.37
time fit was run	2020-07-26 22:06:42 UTC

		coef	exp(coef)	se(coef)	coef lower 95%	coef upper 95%	exp(coef) lower 95%	exp(coef) upper 95%	z	p	-log2(p)
param	covariate
lambda_	Intercept	4.05	57.44	0.59	2.90	5.20	18.21	181.15	6.91	<0.005	37.61
	age	0.06	1.06	0.02	0.01	0.10	1.01	1.10	2.55	0.01	6.52
	fin	0.37	1.44	0.19	-0.01	0.74	0.99	2.10	1.92	0.06	4.18
	mar	0.43	1.53	0.38	-0.32	1.17	0.73	3.24	1.12	0.26	1.93
	paro	0.08	1.09	0.20	-0.30	0.47	0.74	1.59	0.42	0.67	0.57
	prio	-0.09	0.92	0.03	-0.14	-0.03	0.87	0.97	-3.03	<0.005	8.65
	race	-0.30	0.74	0.31	-0.91	0.30	0.40	1.35	-0.99	0.32	1.63
	wexp	0.15	1.16	0.21	-0.27	0.56	0.76	1.75	0.69	0.49	1.03

AIC	1388.73
log-likelihood ratio test	31.22 on 7 df
-log2(p) of ll-ratio test	14.11

In [2]:

class DependentCompetingRisksHazard(ParametricRegressionFitter):
    """

    Reference
    --------------
    Frees and Valdez, UNDERSTANDING RELATIONSHIPS USING COPULAS
    
    """
    
    _fitted_parameter_names = ["lambda1", "rho1", "lambda2", "rho2", "alpha"]

    def _cumulative_hazard(self, params, T, Xs):
        lambda1 = np.exp(np.dot(Xs["lambda1"], params["lambda1"]))
        lambda2 = np.exp(np.dot(Xs["lambda2"], params["lambda2"]))
        rho2 =    np.exp(np.dot(Xs["rho2"],    params["rho2"]))
        rho1 =    np.exp(np.dot(Xs["rho1"],    params["rho1"]))
        alpha =   np.exp(np.dot(Xs["alpha"],   params["alpha"]))

        return ((T / lambda1) ** rho1 + (T / lambda2) ** rho2) ** alpha


fitter = DependentCompetingRisksHazard(penalizer=0.1)

rossi = load_rossi()
rossi["week"] = rossi["week"] / rossi["week"].max() # scaling often helps with convergence

covariates = {
    "lambda1": rossi.columns.difference(['week', 'arrest']),
    "lambda2": rossi.columns.difference(['week', 'arrest']),
    "rho1": "1",
    "rho2": "1",
    "alpha": "1",
}

fitter.fit(rossi, "week", event_col="arrest", regressors=covariates, timeline=np.linspace(0, 2))
fitter.print_summary(2)

ax = fitter.plot()

ax = fitter.predict_survival_function(rossi.loc[::100]).plot(figsize=(8, 4))
ax.set_title("Predicted survival functions for selected subjects")

/Users/camerondavidson-pilon/code/lifelines/lifelines/fitters/__init__.py:1985: StatisticalWarning: The diagonal of the variance_matrix_ has negative values. This could be a problem with DependentCompetingRisksHazard's fit to the data.

It's advisable to not trust the variances reported, and to be suspicious of the fitted parameters too.

  warnings.warn(warning_text, exceptions.StatisticalWarning)

model	lifelines.DependentCompetingRisksHazard
duration col	'week'
event col	'arrest'
penalizer	0.1
number of observations	432
number of events observed	114
log-likelihood	-239.19
time fit was run	2020-07-26 22:06:55 UTC

		coef	exp(coef)	se(coef)	coef lower 95%	coef upper 95%	exp(coef) lower 95%	exp(coef) upper 95%	z	p	-log2(p)
param	covariate
lambda1	age	0.05	1.05	0.02	0.02	0.08	1.02	1.09	3.06	<0.005	8.80
	fin	0.23	1.26	0.19	-0.15	0.61	0.86	1.84	1.18	0.24	2.06
	mar	0.21	1.23	0.35	-0.48	0.90	0.62	2.46	0.59	0.56	0.84
	paro	0.13	1.14	0.25	-0.36	0.63	0.69	1.88	0.52	0.60	0.74
	prio	-0.04	0.96	0.04	-0.11	0.04	0.89	1.04	-0.93	0.35	1.50
	race	0.07	1.07	nan	nan	nan	nan	nan	nan	nan	nan
	wexp	0.16	1.17	0.17	-0.17	0.48	0.85	1.62	0.94	0.35	1.53
lambda2	age	0.05	1.05	0.02	0.01	0.09	1.01	1.10	2.34	0.02	5.70
	fin	0.23	1.26	0.19	-0.15	0.61	0.86	1.84	1.18	0.24	2.06
	mar	0.21	1.23	0.35	-0.48	0.90	0.62	2.46	0.59	0.56	0.84
	paro	0.13	1.14	0.25	-0.36	0.63	0.69	1.88	0.52	0.60	0.74
	prio	-0.04	0.96	0.04	-0.11	0.04	0.89	1.04	-0.93	0.35	1.50
	race	0.07	1.07	nan	nan	nan	nan	nan	nan	nan	nan
	wexp	0.16	1.17	0.17	-0.17	0.48	0.85	1.62	0.94	0.35	1.53
rho1	Intercept	0.15	1.16	0.13	-0.11	0.40	0.90	1.50	1.14	0.25	1.98
rho2	Intercept	0.15	1.16	0.15	-0.15	0.44	0.86	1.56	0.99	0.32	1.62
alpha	Intercept	0.18	1.19	0.15	-0.12	0.47	0.89	1.61	1.18	0.24	2.06

AIC	512.38
log-likelihood ratio test	127.04 on 12 df
-log2(p) of ll-ratio test	68.48

Out[2]:

Text(0.5, 1.0, 'Predicted survival functions for selected subjects')

Cure models¶

Suppose in our population we have a subpopulation that will never experience the event of interest. Or, for some subjects the event will occur so far in the future that it's essentially at time infinity. In this case, the survival function for an individual should not asymptically approach zero, but some positive value. Models that describe this are sometimes called cure models (i.e. the subject is "cured" of death and hence no longer susceptible) or time-lagged conversion models.

It would be nice to be able to use common survival models and have some "cure" component. Let's suppose that for individuals that will experience the event of interest, their survival distrubtion is a Weibull, denoted $S_W(t)$. For a random selected individual in the population, thier survival curve, $S(t)$, is:

$$ \begin{align*} S(t) = P(T > t) &= P(\text{cured}) P(T > t\;|\;\text{cured}) + P(\text{not cured}) P(T > t\;|\;\text{not cured}) \\ &= p + (1-p) S_W(t) \end{align*} $$

Even though it's in an unconvential form, we can still determine the cumulative hazard (which is the negative logarithm of the survival function):

$$ H(t) = -\log{\left(p + (1-p) S_W(t)\right)} $$

In [3]:

from autograd.scipy.special import expit

class CureModel(ParametricRegressionFitter):
    _scipy_fit_method = "SLSQP"
    _scipy_fit_options = {"ftol": 1e-10, "maxiter": 200}

    _fitted_parameter_names = ["lambda_", "beta_", "rho_"]

    def _cumulative_hazard(self, params, T, Xs):
        c = expit(np.dot(Xs["beta_"], params["beta_"]))

        lambda_ = np.exp(np.dot(Xs["lambda_"], params["lambda_"]))
        rho_ = np.exp(np.dot(Xs["rho_"], params["rho_"]))
        sf = np.exp(-(T / lambda_) ** rho_)

        return -np.log((1 - c) + c * sf)


cm = CureModel(penalizer=0.0)

rossi = load_rossi()

covariates = {"lambda_": rossi.columns.difference(['week', 'arrest']), "rho_": "1", "beta_": 'fin + 1'}

cm.fit(rossi, "week", event_col="arrest", regressors=covariates, timeline=np.arange(250)) 
cm.print_summary(2)

model	lifelines.CureModel
duration col	'week'
event col	'arrest'
number of observations	432
number of events observed	114
log-likelihood	-702.64
time fit was run	2020-07-26 22:07:13 UTC

		coef	exp(coef)	se(coef)	coef lower 95%	coef upper 95%	exp(coef) lower 95%	exp(coef) upper 95%	z	p	-log2(p)
param	covariate
lambda_	age	0.16	1.17	0.05	0.05	0.26	1.06	1.30	2.96	<0.005	8.36
	fin	1.14	3.13	4320.37	-8466.63	8468.92	0.00	inf	0.00	1.00	0.00
	mar	0.35	1.42	0.32	-0.27	0.97	0.76	2.64	1.11	0.27	1.90
	paro	0.26	1.30	0.24	-0.20	0.72	0.82	2.06	1.10	0.27	1.88
	prio	-0.02	0.98	0.04	-0.10	0.06	0.91	1.06	-0.51	0.61	0.71
	race	0.23	1.26	0.28	-0.32	0.79	0.72	2.20	0.82	0.41	1.29
	wexp	0.25	1.28	0.17	-0.08	0.57	0.92	1.78	1.49	0.14	2.86
rho_	Intercept	0.13	1.14	0.08	-0.03	0.29	0.97	1.34	1.57	0.12	3.11
beta_	Intercept	0.18	1.19	0.10	-0.02	0.37	0.98	1.45	1.75	0.08	3.64
beta_	fin	15.80	7.30e+06	0.17	15.46	16.14	5.20e+06	1.03e+07	90.99	<0.005	inf

AIC	1425.29
log-likelihood ratio test	-12.04 on 7 df
-log2(p) of ll-ratio test	-0.00

In [4]:

cm.predict_survival_function(rossi.loc[::100]).plot(figsize=(12,6))

Out[4]:

<AxesSubplot:>

In [5]:

# what's the effect on the survival curve if I vary "age"
fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(12, 6))

cm.plot_covariate_groups(['age'], values=np.arange(20, 50, 5), cmap='coolwarm', ax=ax)

Out[5]:

<AxesSubplot:>

Spline models¶

See royston_parmar_splines.py in the examples folder: https://github.com/CamDavidsonPilon/lifelines/tree/master/examples